I agree on the symptom, but disagree on the problem and solution.
First off, as much as I am pro-"third" party (and I have voted third party a lot in my life, fwiw), I think it's foolish to believe that having more choices would mean less corporate influence. I doubt BP et al give two shits who they bribe. Furthermore, more parties means that the winner often has many more detractors than supporters, which can lead to something benign like general malaise or outright coups as the losing majority realizes that they can just take power if they want it.
The larger problem is out of control corporate influence in elections, news, and legislation, and fixing that would go a long way toward (1) cleaning up the existing major parties (2) making so-called third parties more viable, and (3) helping people to possibly be more informed.
And as much as Obama has "let us down" I also am not that shocked - he's always been pretty Centrist and corporatist from what I can tell, despite the cheerleading from the left and the fear mongering from the right which has said otherwise. And yes, I think that the Democrats are far less dangerous than the GOP lately, even though they both skew right. To say there's no difference between the parties overemphasizes the similarities and oversimplifies the differences that are rather plain to see.
If you want real change than work to make elections publicly funded, to reduce corporate control of legislation, and to reduce the unfettered deregulation and "let's privatize everything" BS which doesn't seem to work.
_________________ "The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other... involves orcs." - Kung Fu Monkey
|